09:00-10:30 |
Educational Program
|
Session |
FERTILITY PRESERVATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS AND BEYOND |
Capsule |
Male and female fertility preservation became a potent tool option not only for cancer survivors but also for the current delay in family planning or, so called "social freezing" |
| Chairpersons |
Dominique De Ziegler, France |
| 09:00-09:20 |
Recent advances and new frontier in vitrification |
| 09:20-09:45 |
Cryopreservation of oocytes and ovarian tissue |
| 09:45-10:05 |
Prepubertal germ cell storage for later transplantation |
| 10:05-10:30 |
Preservation of fertility by uterine transplantation: Who are the candidates and what results can be expected? |
10:50-12:20 |
SOCIAL FREEZING: GOOD OR BAD NEWS FOR WOMEN? |
|
| Capsule |
It seems that social freezing is not synchronized with the need for it. While social freezing is better done before age 35, women in that age group still hope to conceive spontaneously or with treatment. Is it a good solution for the wrong age group? |
|
| Chairpersons |
Simon Fishel, UK |
|
| 10:50-11:10 |
Fundamental cryobiology for clinical embryologists |
|
| 11:10-11:35 |
Oocyte cryopreservation techniques and factors associated with survival and viability |
|
|
11:35-12:20 |
|
14:50-16:20 |
IMPLANTATION |
|
|
Implantation failure can occur due to many reasons. It's the most crucial step and very little is known about why implantation fails so often
|
|
14:50-15:10
|
Lab-technologies needed to maximize success Laura Rienzi, Italy |
| 15:10-15:35 | Implantation failure: The lab point of view Tina Buchholz, Germany |
|
15:35-15:55
|
Implantation failure: The clinician point of view
Dominique De Ziegler, France |
|
15:55-16:20
|
Improving implantation by "freeze all and later transfer," is it now proven to be more efficient? Paul Devroey, Belgium |
16:40-18:10 |
INVASIVE PROCEDURES ON THE EMBRYO: PGS |
|
| Capsule |
Different invasive procedures allow selecting and maybe improving the embryo before implantation. Are they safe? |
|
| Chairpersons |
Laszlo Nanassy, Hungary |
|
| 16:40-17:00 |
Epigenetics and imprinting in ART |
|
| 17:00-17:25 |
The new ERA of PGS |
|
| 17:25-18:10 17:25-17:40 17:40-17:55 17:55-18:10 |
|
09:00-10:30 |
POOR OVARIAN RESERVE |
|
| Capsule |
Poor ovarian reserve is easily recognized and poorly managed. The ideal stimulation for these patients remains a great challenge for the clinician. Is there any better solution? | |
| Chairperson | Gab Kovacs, Australia János Urbancsek, Hungary |
|
09:00-09:45 09:00-09:15 09:15-09:30 09:30-09:45 |
|
|
| 09:45-10:05 | Pronuclear transplantation to prevent transmission of mitochondrial DNA disease. What are the risks? Louise Hyslop, UK |
|
| 10:05-10:30 | Is there an ideal stimulation for POR? Nicholas Zech, Austria |
10:50-12:20 |
METHODS FOR EMBRYO SELECTION: TOWARDS SET FOR ALL
|
| Capsule | Improved ability to select the best oocytes for fertilization and embryos for implantation will likely increase use of single embryo transfer (SET) technology in IVF. Current screening methods, while providing useful information, are far from ideal - especially when each is used alone. Can a combination of methods, including new technologies, help secure better IVF success rates? |
| Chairperson | Bart C.J.M. Fauser, The Netherlands |
| 10:50–11:00 | Session introduction Bart C.J.M. Fauser, The Netherlands |
| 11:00–11:20 | Methods for embryo selection: One is not enough? Basak Balaban, Turkey |
| 11:20–11:40 | The oocyte - what does it bring? How to assess it? Bart C.J.M. Fauser, The Netherlands |
| 11:40–11:55 | Non-invasive markers: The role of G-CSF? Carine Munaut, Belgium |
| 11:55–12:10 | Luteal phase support and endometrial receptivity János Urbancsek, Hungary |
| 12:10–12:20 | Summary and close Bart C.J.M. Fauser, The Netherlands |
12:30-14:00 |
TIME-LAPSE: BETTER INCUBATOR, NEW METHOD FOR EMBRYO SELECTION OR JUST NEW COSTLY TOOL? |
|
| Capsule | Time-lapse is the new hype in embryo culture and selection. Time-lapse provides information on the timing of cell division, fragmentation, multi-nucleation, compaction, blastulation, and more. It also offers a list of advantages for embryo incubation like flexible gas mixture, grouping of embryos, monitoring, archiving, etc. Is it a better incubator? New method for embryo selection that overrides the biologists |
|
| Chairpersons | Rene Frydman, France Laura Rienzi, Italy Rita Vassena, Spain |
|
12:30-13:15 12:30-12:45 12:45-13:00 13:00-13:15 |
|
|
13:15-14:00 13:15-13:30 13:30-13:45 13:45-14:00 |
|
14:50-16:20 |
PCOS: REPRODUCTION AND BEYOND |
| Capsule | PCOS affects all phases of life but yes, we still poorly understand this enigmatic syndrome |
| Chairpersons |
Zion Ben-Rafael, Israel Philippe Bouchard, France Eva Csajbok, Hungary |
| 14:50-15:20 | Metabolic dysfunction and its implications Philippe Bouchard, France |
| 15:20-15:50 | Reproductive dysfunction and intervention Bart C.J.M. Fauser, The Netherlands |
| 15:50-16:20 |
Perimenopause and management
Rogerio Lobo, USA |
16:40-18:10 |
Hot ControversiesRTD ON CLINICALLY AND LABORATORY RELATED CONTROVERSIES |
| Chairpersons |
Zion Ben Rafael, Israel |
| Discussants |
Norbert Gleicher, USA |
| |
Questions for the panel:
|